The last Utopia
In the first chapter of Samuel Myon’s, The Last Utopia he explains how “the rights of man” is different from “human rights”.
According to Myon human rights are a transition into the social movement. There have been people that created their own version of human rights. But explained by Myon human rights are treated as inborn, or long in preparation, people will not confront the true reason they have become so powerful today and examine whether those reasons are still persuasive (13). People know that human rights are treated as if you were born with it so why become so powerful when everyone was born with the same rights. Human rights were to be achieved through citizenship and to be protected. After 1945 Human rights didn’t serve as a foundation it just contradicted the sovereign nation. Human rights were seen as cosmopolitan faith (13) the Greeks thought they must have a place in history of human rights. That was opposed and equally believed that humans are apart of the same group and the rights are shared. In order for utopia to exist globalism and internationalism had to be ruled out. In the 1970 human rights focused on political and civil rights.
Myon described rights of man being a utopian that produced emotions, it inspired liberty and equality. These rights were a contemporary to human rights. Also it became the first principle of a constitution and farmers were forced to add it on to their own work in order to gain support of the right to man. This right is all about incorporating people a true meaning of citizenship. This is when democracy began. If this right became a movement it would secure the rights of the citizen nationwide.
Once the the rights was announced that they were God given or natural rights no one saw that they should include them. They could change them if they did live up to the demands. Rights were starting to be seen as creature, this made them decline. With the rights declining citizen movements were made. Women and workers and even enslaved blacks started to proclaim them. Animals were in deserving of rights. Human rights and rights of man may have seen to coincide with one another dealing with citizenship.
